Information about the number of pixels on the horizontal and vertical side of the screen. Some of the standard and widely used aspect ratios are 4:3, 5:4, 16:9 and 16:10. The ratio between the horizontal and the vertical side of the display. The maximum number of colors, which the display is able to reproduce, depends on the type of the panel in use and color enhancing technologies like FRC. For example, by using FRC, a 6-bit display panel is able to show 16.7 millioin colors, which are typical for 8-bit display panels, and not the standard 262200 colors, instead. With quick cyclic switching between different color tones, an illusion for a new intermediate color tone is created. They provide 18-, 24-, and 30-bit color, respectively.įrame Rate Control (FRC) is a method, which allows the pixels to show more color tones. The most widely used panels are those with 6, 8, and 10 bits for each of the RGB components of the pixel. The image quality depends directly on the type of the display panel used. Each has its own specific features - viewing angles, color reproduction, response time, brightness/contrast, production cost, etc. Information about the model of the panel used. Name of the manufacturer of the display panel. If the manufacturer does not provide such information, the height is calculated from the diagonal and the aspect ratio. If the manufacturer does not provide such information, the width is calculated from the diagonal and the aspect ratio.Īpproximate height of the display. If the manufacturer does not provide such information, the diagonal is calculated from the width and height of the screen.Īpproximate width of the display. Often this is the rounded value of the actual size of the diagonal in inches.Īpproximate diagonal size of the display. Size class of the display as declared by the manufacturer. I tried calibrating to 5700k as well, which makes the monitors more look alike, but still clearly distinguishable.Display Information about the main characteristics of the display - panel, backlight, resolution, refresh rate, etc. So when you look at both monitors side by side at the Windows desktop wallpaper, you still see a clear difference after calibration, U2410 more cyan, U2414h more like real blue tones (which it is supposed to look like I think). After doing this, pure white looks good again, BUT especially blue colors like in the default Windows 10 desktop wallpaper still look cyanish because of the yellowish tint.Īnd it looks like the SRGB coverage is suffering a lot because the monitor achieves only 94% SRGB after calibration, which is bad because it’s supposed to do 100%. ![]() So Displaycal wants me to reduce the R-slider quite a lot to get back to the desired white point. Almost every color has a slight yellowish tint which wasn’t the case when I bought the monitor (the pre-calibrated SRGB preset was nearly perfect at this time). Problem here: The monitor is ~6 years old and it seems like the CCFL backlight has somehow aged. I followed an advice from some guys in the Dell forum and used the factory menu for OSD adjustment of the white point (because usually SRGB preset doesn’t offer RGB sliders). Problem with this monitor: After calibration, colors look fine (judging by eye), but the SRGB coverage is only 88%, which seems rather bad because the monitor is advertized by Dell to achieve 96% SRGB.īecause I want to do everything in SRGB, the U2410 was set to its SRGB emulation preset. The U2414H was in custom mode and I got to the desired white point by changing the OSD controls to R=100, G=100, B=98. ![]() I calibrated both monitors to D65 Gamma 2.2, using the CCFL Wide Gamut IPS correction for U2410 and White LED for U2414H. I directly started using Displaycal and not the original software that came with the Colormunki, so I just plugged it in and let Displaycal download the colorimeter corrections. I’m new to display calibration and bought and X-Rite Colormunki Display for calibration and profiling of my Dell U2410 and U2414h.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |